The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters2 active
14 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
- Ветеран Медіа
- Readers and grants
- 96 items in 7 days
- Advokat Post
- Readers and grants
- 90 items in 7 days
- UAnimals
- Readers and grants
- 38 items in 7 days
- Асоціація адвокатів України (ААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 36 items in 7 days
- Національна асоціація адвокатів України (НААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 35 items in 7 days
- nauka.ua
- Readers and grants
- 30 items in 7 days
- DeepState
- Readers and grants
- 21 items in 7 days
- Юридична сотня
- Readers and grants
- 14 items in 7 days
- Сергій FLASH | Про технології
- Readers and grants
- 13 items in 7 days
- Жіночий ветеранський рух (VETERANKA)
- Readers and grants
- 13 items in 7 days
- Асоціація правників України (АПУ)
- Readers and grants
- 12 items in 7 days
- Судовий репортер
- Readers and grants
- 3 items in 7 days
- Дикі Шершні
- Readers and grants
- 0 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters













