The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters3 active
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,724 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- Оперативний ЗСУ
- Undisclosed
- 618 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 525 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Инсайдер UA
- Undisclosed
- 491 items in 7 days
- Exilenova+
- Undisclosed
- 442 items in 7 days
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
- Реальна Війна | Україна | Новини
- Undisclosed
- 396 items in 7 days
- Правда Геращенко
- Big capital, political ties
- 384 items in 7 days
- Supernova+
- Undisclosed
- 316 items in 7 days
- СТЕРНЕНКО
- Media business
- 254 items in 7 days
- Судово-юридична газета
- Media business
- 236 items in 7 days
- Лачен пише
- Media business
- 235 items in 7 days
- monitoring (Мониторинг)
- Undisclosed
- 227 items in 7 days
- БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
- Media business
- 176 items in 7 days
- АНТИРЕЙД
- Media business
- 164 items in 7 days
- VETERAN.COM.UA
- Not classified yet
- 150 items in 7 days
- monitor (Монітор)
- Undisclosed
- 144 items in 7 days
- BBC News Україна
- Public money
- 139 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Денис Казанський
- Media business
- 104 items in 7 days
- Ветеран Медіа
- Readers and grants
- 96 items in 7 days
