The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters3 active
11 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 33 канал (Хмельниччина)
- Media business
- 856 items in 7 days
- Ми — Україна
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 656 items in 7 days
- Ірта-fax (медіахолдинг «ІРТА», Сєвєродонецьк)
- Media business
- 358 items in 7 days
- Факти ICTV
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 357 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- Громадське радіо
- Readers and grants
- 210 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Рівне 1
- Media business
- 191 items in 7 days
- Телерадіокомпанія «ВіККа» (Черкаси)
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 76 items in 7 days
- Телеканал «Інфо Плюс»
- Media business
- 39 items in 7 days
- Телебачення «Капрі» (Покровськ)
- Media business
- 20 items in 7 days
- 11 канал (Дніпро)
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 13 items in 7 days
- RADIO7 (Закарпаття)
- Media business
- 0 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters