The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters2 active
12 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Суспільне Миколаїв
- Public money
- 785 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Чернігів
- Public money
- 709 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Хмельницький
- Public money
- 618 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Черкаси
- Public money
- 603 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 525 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Суспільне Івано-Франківськ
- Public money
- 439 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Вінниця
- Public money
- 417 items in 7 days
- Радіо Свобода
- Public money
- 398 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Суспільне Запоріжжя
- Public money
- 337 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Донбас
- Public money
- 251 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Ужгород
- Public money
- 192 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Крим
- Public money
- 142 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters