The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters3 active
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 24 Канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 2,058 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,304 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- ТСН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,274 items in 7 days
- score 68/100
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 525 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Радіо Свобода
- Public money
- 398 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Громадське
- Readers and grants
- 366 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Судово-юридична газета
- Media business
- 236 items in 7 days
- АНТИРЕЙД
- Media business
- 164 items in 7 days
- 1+1
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 99 items in 7 days
- 5 канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 95 items in 7 days
- UAnimals
- Readers and grants
- 38 items in 7 days
- Асоціація адвокатів України (ААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 36 items in 7 days
- Країна ФМ
- Media business
- 1 item in 7 days
- 2+2
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 0 items in 7 days
- Радіо Байрактар
- Media business
- 0 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters