The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
13 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Дзеркало тижня
- Media business
- 686 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Українське Слово (Чикаго)
- Media business
- 568 items in 7 days
- Волинь
- Media business
- 308 items in 7 days
- Високий Замок
- Media business
- 293 items in 7 days
- Рівне Вечірнє
- Media business
- 79 items in 7 days
- Восточный проект
- Undisclosed
- 33 items in 7 days
- Український тиждень
- Media business
- 27 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- «Запорозька Січ»
- Media business
- 18 items in 7 days
- Slidstvo.Info
- Readers and grants
- 13 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Версії (Чернівці)
- Media business
- 8 items in 7 days
- Ukraine Crisis Media Center
- Readers and grants
- 7 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Над Бугом і Нарвою
- Readers and grants
- 2 items in 7 days
- Союз українок Америки — журнал «Наше життя»
- Readers and grants
- 0 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters