The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters3 active
9 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,724 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,304 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Інтерфакс-Україна
- Media business
- 870 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- ІА «Контекст-Причорномор'я»
- Media business
- 143 items in 7 days
- ІА «Статус Кво»
- Media business
- 131 items in 7 days
- ЦТС — Центр транспортних стратегій
- Media business
- 85 items in 7 days
- ExPro
- Media business
- 69 items in 7 days
- ІА «Вчасно»
- Readers and grants
- 66 items in 7 days
- GMK Center
- Media business
- 51 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters








