The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters2 active
40 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
- Громадське
- Readers and grants
- 366 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Новинарня
- Readers and grants
- 270 items in 7 days
- score 91/100
- Громадське радіо
- Readers and grants
- 210 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- The Kyiv Independent
- Readers and grants
- 167 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Ветеран Медіа
- Readers and grants
- 96 items in 7 days
- Advokat Post
- Readers and grants
- 90 items in 7 days
- GreenPost
- Readers and grants
- 57 items in 7 days
- Інститут масової інформації
- Readers and grants
- 50 items in 7 days
- UAnimals
- Readers and grants
- 38 items in 7 days
- JewishNews (Єврейські новини України)
- Readers and grants
- 37 items in 7 days
- Асоціація адвокатів України (ААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 36 items in 7 days
- Національна спілка журналістів України
- Readers and grants
- 31 items in 7 days
- nauka.ua
- Readers and grants
- 30 items in 7 days
- Еко.Район
- Readers and grants
- 26 items in 7 days
- Український інтерес
- Readers and grants
- 23 items in 7 days
- DeepState
- Readers and grants
- 21 items in 7 days
- Освіторія Медіа
- Readers and grants
- 17 items in 7 days
- Юридична сотня
- Readers and grants
- 14 items in 7 days
- Slidstvo.Info
- Readers and grants
- 13 items in 7 days
- score 88/100



















