The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters3 active
More filters3 active
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 24 Канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 2,058 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,724 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- NV
- Media business
- 1,696 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,421 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,304 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- ТСН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,274 items in 7 days
- score 68/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,248 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 916 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 912 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 872 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Інтерфакс-Україна
- Media business
- 870 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 785 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 657 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Оперативний ЗСУ
- Undisclosed
- 618 items in 7 days
- Главред
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 543 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Європейська правда
- Media business
- 536 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 525 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Инсайдер UA
- Undisclosed
- 491 items in 7 days
- Exilenova+
- Undisclosed
- 442 items in 7 days
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
