Supreme Court reviewed the case on credit histories
- Earliest collected report:LexInform / Юридичний вісник України
The Supreme Court partially granted the plaintiff’s cassation appeal in a credit history case. The court stated that the burden of proof regarding the borrower’s written consent lies with the creditor and the Credit History Bureau.
In brief
- The court partially granted the plaintiff’s cassation appeal.
- The burden of proof lies with the creditor and the Credit History Bureau.
- The plaintiff challenged the transfer of information without consent.
Covered by 1 of 6 media groups
- Budget not in the collected reports
- Public money not in the collected reports
- Media business 1 source
- Big capital not in the collected reports
- Readers and grants not in the collected reports
- Undisclosed not in the collected reports
No newsrooms from these groups in the collected reports: budget, public money, big capital, readers and grants, undisclosed.
| Group | Share | Count |
|---|---|---|
Media business
| 100% | 2 items |
- Who the outlets write for
- community 0
- region 0
- country 1
- world 0
- Channels
- Websites 1
- Telegram 1
- LexInform / Юридичний вісник УкраїниMedia business
- first item
- earliest
- national desk
У справах про виключення відомостей з кредитної історії тягар доведення наявності письмової згоди позичальника покладається на кредитора та Бюро кредитних історій
Comments
Loading comments…