Source card
Суспільне Кропивницький
Public moneyReporterWeek from 12 October: Courier, 58%
Over 8 complete weeks: 24 August – 18 October
Data for only 7 weeks of 8: the figures are counted over those
What “higher than N% of sources” compares with
It is the share of the other sources that count toward coverage and have this figure whose value is lower. A source with the same value is not counted as lower. Views are compared only among sources whose posts have view counts.
- Speed
- 67%
- Share of events where the source's report was the earliest collected or in the waveof 670 events the source was inhigher than 35% of sources
- Originality
- 34%
- Share of its own reports: not a rewrite or a forwardof 1,210 compared reportshigher than 3% of sources
- Transparency
- 0 of 100
- A practice-score criterion from the source's profileowner, beneficial owner, legal entity, media registry, funding sourceshigher than 0% of sources
- Framing tone
- −0.31
- Mean framing tone of its reports: from −1 (negative) to +1 (positive)Not a measure of quality or truthfulnessmore positive than 6% of sources
- Post views
- 12.8m views
- Total views of the source's posts in collected events over these weeks: Telegram, YouTube, XNot a count of people: one reader can view many postsmore than 69% of sources with measured views
