Source card
UAnimals
Readers and grantsReporterWeek from 19 October: Courier, 100%
Over 8 complete weeks: 31 August – 25 October
What “higher than N% of sources” compares with
It is the share of the other sources that count toward coverage and have this figure whose value is lower. A source with the same value is not counted as lower. Views are compared only among sources whose posts have view counts.
- Speed
- 96%
- Share of events where the source's report was the earliest collected or in the waveof 106 events the source was inhigher than 88% of sources
- Originality
- 100%
- Share of its own reports: not a rewrite or a forwardof 140 compared reportshigher than 84% of sources
- Transparency
- 0 of 100
- A practice-score criterion from the source's profileowner, beneficial owner, legal entity, media registry, funding sourceshigher than 0% of sources
- Framing tone
- +0.02
- Mean framing tone of its reports: from −1 (negative) to +1 (positive)Not a measure of quality or truthfulnessmore positive than 92% of sources
- Post views
- 251.4k views
- Total views of the source's posts in collected events over these weeks: Telegram, YouTube, XNot a count of people: one reader can view many postsmore than 25% of sources with measured views