The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
197 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- NV
- Media business
- 1,697 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,420 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,249 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Цензор.НЕТ
- Media business
- 1,143 items in 7 days
- score 71/100
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 917 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 912 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 873 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 783 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Українська правда
- Media business
- 705 items in 7 days
- score 91/100
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 659 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Informator
- Media business
- 625 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- InternetUA
- Undisclosed
- 589 items in 7 days
- Главред
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 546 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Європейська правда
- Media business
- 536 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- ГОРДОН
- Media business
- 518 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Букви
- Media business
- 472 items in 7 days
- score 94/100
- Ділова столиця
- Media business
- 464 items in 7 days
- Zaxid.net
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 457 items in 7 days
- score 94/100
- Delo.ua
- Media business
- 424 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
