The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters1 active
More filters1 active
285 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- NV
- Media business
- 1,697 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,422 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,246 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Цензор.НЕТ
- Media business
- 1,145 items in 7 days
- score 71/100
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 917 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 915 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 876 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 785 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Українська правда
- Media business
- 715 items in 7 days
- score 91/100
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 660 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Informator
- Media business
- 622 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- InternetUA
- Undisclosed
- 588 items in 7 days
- Главред
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 545 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Європейська правда
- Media business
- 537 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- ГОРДОН
- Media business
- 517 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Букви
- Media business
- 472 items in 7 days
- score 94/100
- Ділова столиця
- Media business
- 463 items in 7 days
- Zaxid.net
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 456 items in 7 days
- score 94/100
- Delo.ua
- Media business
- 423 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
