The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters1 active
More filters1 active
14 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,731 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,310 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- 1NEWS
- Undisclosed
- 927 items in 7 days
- Інтерфакс-Україна
- Media business
- 871 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- Українські Національні Новини
- Media business
- 708 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- ІА «Контекст-Причорномор'я»
- Media business
- 144 items in 7 days
- ІА «Статус Кво»
- Media business
- 130 items in 7 days
- ЦТС — Центр транспортних стратегій
- Media business
- 85 items in 7 days
- ExPro
- Media business
- 69 items in 7 days
- ІА «Вчасно»
- Readers and grants
- 66 items in 7 days
- GMK Center
- Media business
- 51 items in 7 days
- enkorr
- Media business
- 3 items in 7 days
- Мінпром
- Media business
- 0 items in 7 days
- ІА «МОСТ-Дніпро»
- Media business
- 0 items in 7 days
That is every source for these filters