The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
119 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- NV
- Media business
- 1,697 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,420 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,249 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 917 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 912 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 873 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 783 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 659 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Главред
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 546 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Європейська правда
- Media business
- 536 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Zaxid.net
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 457 items in 7 days
- score 94/100
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
- Новини N
- Media business
- 392 items in 7 days
- ArmyINFORM
- Budget
- 390 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Твоє місто
- Readers and grants
- 329 items in 7 days
- Рівне Медіа
- Media business
- 308 items in 7 days
- Kyiv Post
- Media business
- 267 items in 7 days
- score 90/100
- ЛІГА.net
- Media business
- 258 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- Судово-юридична газета
- Media business
- 235 items in 7 days
- Версії (Івано-Франківськ)
- Readers and grants
- 235 items in 7 days
