The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
60 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,731 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- Українська правда
- Media business
- 705 items in 7 days
- score 91/100
- Ми — Україна
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 671 items in 7 days
- Оперативний ЗСУ
- Undisclosed
- 618 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 520 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Инсайдер UA
- Undisclosed
- 488 items in 7 days
- Exilenova+
- Undisclosed
- 446 items in 7 days
- Товариство Червоного Хреста України
- Readers and grants
- 417 items in 7 days
- Реальна Війна | Україна | Новини
- Undisclosed
- 397 items in 7 days
- Правда Геращенко
- Big capital, political ties
- 382 items in 7 days
- МВС
- Budget
- 354 items in 7 days
- score 80/100
- Supernova+
- Undisclosed
- 322 items in 7 days
- ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
- Media business
- 288 items in 7 days
- СТЕРНЕНКО
- Media business
- 243 items in 7 days
- Судово-юридична газета
- Media business
- 235 items in 7 days
- Лачен пише
- Media business
- 234 items in 7 days
- monitoring (Мониторинг)
- Undisclosed
- 227 items in 7 days
- Парламентський телеканал «Рада»
- Budget
- 185 items in 7 days
- БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
- Media business
- 178 items in 7 days
- АНТИРЕЙД
- Media business
- 164 items in 7 days
