The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters1 active
More filters1 active
242 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 24 Канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 2,061 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,737 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- NV
- Media business
- 1,697 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,422 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,309 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- ТСН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,267 items in 7 days
- score 68/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,246 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Цензор.НЕТ
- Media business
- 1,145 items in 7 days
- score 71/100
- 1NEWS
- Undisclosed
- 924 items in 7 days
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 917 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 915 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 876 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Інтерфакс-Україна
- Media business
- 870 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 785 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Українська правда
- Media business
- 715 items in 7 days
- score 91/100
- Українські Національні Новини
- Media business
- 709 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Дзеркало тижня
- Media business
- 686 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Ми — Україна
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 665 items in 7 days
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 660 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Informator
- Media business
- 622 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
