The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
29 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 24 Канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 2,064 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,310 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- ТСН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,270 items in 7 days
- score 68/100
- Ми — Україна
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 671 items in 7 days
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 520 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Радіо Свобода
- Public money
- 398 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Громадське
- Readers and grants
- 366 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Факти ICTV
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 356 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- Судово-юридична газета
- Media business
- 235 items in 7 days
- Громадське радіо
- Readers and grants
- 210 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- АНТИРЕЙД
- Media business
- 164 items in 7 days
- 1+1
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 99 items in 7 days
- 5 канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 94 items in 7 days
- UAnimals
- Readers and grants
- 38 items in 7 days
- Асоціація адвокатів України (ААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 36 items in 7 days
- Національна асоціація адвокатів України (НААУ)
- Readers and grants
- 35 items in 7 days
- Країна ФМ
- Media business
- 1 item in 7 days
- М1
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1 item in 7 days
- ТЕТ
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1 item in 7 days
