The newsrooms covering events: who stands behind them and how they work.
Filters2 active
More filters2 active
109 of 620 sources
How we score sources
Every source earns 0–100 points across four criteria. It is a practice score, not a truth score: how open and consistent a source is — not who is right.
- Transparency
- who stands behind the source: owner, beneficiary, funding
- Coverage completenessnot scored yet
- coverage of tracked events in its beat, within the collected sample
- Editorial practice
- bylines, corrections, news–opinion separation
- Signal reliability
- regular output, full texts, no silent rewrites
- 24 Канал
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 2,064 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Укрінформ
- Budget
- 1,731 items in 7 days
- score 81/100
- NV
- Media business
- 1,697 items in 7 days
- score 88/100
- Обозреватель
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,420 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- УНІАН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,310 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- ТСН
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 1,270 items in 7 days
- score 68/100
- Главком
- Media business
- 1,249 items in 7 days
- score 84/100
- Апостроф
- Media business
- 917 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- LB.ua
- Media business
- 912 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Корреспондент
- Media business
- 873 items in 7 days
- score 83/100
- Інтерфакс-Україна
- Media business
- 871 items in 7 days
- score 93/100
- Фокус
- Media business
- 783 items in 7 days
- score 82/100
- Дзеркало тижня
- Media business
- 686 items in 7 days
- score 86/100
- Телеграф
- Media business
- 659 items in 7 days
- score 78/100
- Оперативний ЗСУ
- Undisclosed
- 618 items in 7 days
- Главред
- Big capital, oligarchic ties
- 546 items in 7 days
- score 79/100
- Європейська правда
- Media business
- 536 items in 7 days
- score 75/100
- Суспільне Новини
- Public money
- 520 items in 7 days
- score 87/100
- Инсайдер UA
- Undisclosed
- 488 items in 7 days
- Exilenova+
- Undisclosed
- 446 items in 7 days
