Synthetic recordings in criminal proceedings: verification possibilities
- Earliest collected report:Національна асоціація адвокатів України (НААУ)
Synthetic audio and video recordings may be unreliable evidence in criminal cases. Similarity of a voice on a recording to that of a suspect is not sufficient to confirm guilt without expert examination.
In brief
- Similarity of a voice on a recording does not prove a person’s guilt.
- The recording may be synthesized or edited by artificial intelligence.
- Verification of the origin and authenticity of the recording is necessary.
- Expert examination can resolve issues with evidence.
Covered by 1 of 6 media groups
- Budget not in the collected reports
- Public money not in the collected reports
- Media business not in the collected reports
- Big capital not in the collected reports
- Readers and grants 2 sources
- Undisclosed not in the collected reports
No newsrooms from these groups in the collected reports: budget, public money, media business, big capital, undisclosed.
| Group | Share | Count |
|---|---|---|
Readers and grants
| 100% | 2 items |
- Who the outlets write for
- community 0
- region 0
- country 2
- world 0
- Channels
- Websites 1
- Telegram 1
- Національна асоціація адвокатів України (НААУ)Readers and grantsActor
- first item
- earliest
- the source itself
Синтетичні аудіо- та відеозаписи у кримінальному провадженні: можливості перевірки
- Національна асоціація адвокатів України (НААУ)Readers and grantsActor
- first item
- in the wave, 3 min later
- the source itself
Синтетичні аудіо- та відеозаписи у кримінальному провадженні: можливості перевірки
Comments
Loading comments…